Tag Archives: us copyright group

ACS:BORE-2010 in review

Posted on January 2, 2011 by Hickster

The stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters, Gallant Macmillan | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Musically – Speculate to accumulate: Mass lawsuits and p2p

Posted on October 22, 2010 by Hickster

This is an article from MusicAlly, an industry site. This article includes contributions from the excellent Beingthreatened.com and your favourite “amateurish shouty, unprofessional” Blog  ACS:BORE Please download the musically Article Musically is a subscription based website aimed at the industry, but … Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ACS:LAW Suffers massive Email leak to the net (SRA REPORT Included)

Posted on September 25, 2010 by Hickster

ACS:LAW have been dealt a catastrophic blow to their “Speculative Invoicing” Business Model. A staggering amount of emails both internal and external have been released onto the Web for all to see Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in Gallant Macmillan, reality pump, scooter, techland, topware | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Players Part One: ACS:LAW and friends

Posted on August 21, 2010 by Hickster

This is a post from an earlier Blog but is worth reposting as the Information is VERY Valid and shows those people accusing others in a truer light.  It is basically scaps of info and news on the people at … Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Gallant Macmillan use Digirights as their “Forensic Experts”

Posted on August 11, 2010 by Hickster

In their letters Gallant Macmillan state that “Ministry of Sound instructed a Software Company to identify occasions when their music is made availiable for download on peer to peer (“p2p”) Networks without it’s consent”. Now Gallant Macmillan DO NO STATE which “Software Company” this is. ACSBORE can reveal that the “Software Company” is none other than DIGIRIGHTS SOLUTIONS(DRS). Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in digiprotect, Gallant Macmillan | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

We’re Back! Article from the Solicitors Health Magazine

Posted on June 17, 2010 by Hickster

An intersting article from the Solicitors Health Magazine, may explain why some people have had such a problem with the legal profession

Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

ACS:LAW Terence Tsang gone and now ….. Forgotten

Posted on June 9, 2010 by Hickster

“It’s all for one my friends
All my Schemes are forgotten
When you leave me on the shelf
I can think of nothing better
Than to sit here by myself”

Deep Purple – Soon Forgotten
Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ACS:LAW – Humiliated by rejection of the US Copyright Group

Posted on June 7, 2010 by Hickster

A laughable comment posted on the ACS:LAW website has been retracted and ammended after a confirmation from the Solicitor Group it claimed to have been “Working in cooperation with” was dismissed by the group. Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What do others think of ACS:LAW and their business plan?

Posted on June 6, 2010 by Hickster

Here is a short list of quotes from people regarding ACS:LAW and their “Business practice”. As can be seen from the diverse range of comment ALL critical of ACS:LAW this is in NO WAY “merely targetted by an Internet campaign” as ACS:LAW Chief Honcho Andrew Crossley claimed.

Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

ACS:LAW’s Greedy friends have lost their minds!

Posted on June 4, 2010 by Hickster

I actually watched Hurt Locker and was soooo dissapointed that I asked for my ticket money back for “failure to provide the services promised” I know I am in a small minority according to IMBD it was a “Good Film” I could not agree less. When I read this post I felt somewhat vindicated and certainly will not be watching anymore of their crap in the future. As far as I was concerned I was swindled out of the money I paid to watch it and was NOT reimbursed as I would have been for any other service or product that had not lived up to my expectations.
Continue reading →

Rate this:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments