Tag Archives: Manuel Reuter

ACS:LAW a “No Show” on the “One Show”

Well ACS:LAWs Andrew Crossley had his chance to defend his “Foolproof” method of identifying people file sharing and he blew it. Not only did he blow it but he has now taken his reputation even lower than anyone previously thought possible. Continue reading

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters, Gallant Macmillan | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Witholding the Truth with ACS:LAW

ACS:LAW has not released ANY information past ambiguous statements regarding their “Willingness” to go to Court. They are now the Record Holder for MOST amount of complaints received by the Solicitor Regulation Authority. Continue reading

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gallant MacMillan “Latest entrants into the hall of Infamy” demand Money for “Ministry of Sound”

As one Solicitor leaves yet another rear’s it’s ugly unwanted head into the “Speculative Invoicing” the idea that you can “Generate alternative money streams” for badly selling tosh by claiming that the reason it did not sell well was that people downloaded it, not that it was a piece of crap that no one wanted.
Continue reading

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters, Gallant Macmillan | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 62 Comments

Ministry of Justice: “ACS:LAWs conduct has caused distress”

What is fascinating about the letter is that the Under Secretary expresses and acknowledges the distress that the actions of ACS:LAW are causing. She also states that whilst the Government itself cannot do anything about it the SRA can, and also alludes to the fact that the SRA can ONLY deal with disciplinary actions whereas Compensation claims must be sought through the CIVIL COURT. Just read that again, here is an extract

Continue reading

Rate this:

Posted in ACS LAW Letters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment